Got a source on this?
Comment on Self hosting on an Android mobile?
r3df0x@7.62x54r.ru 10 months ago
Leaving a mobile device plugged in constantly will fry the battery. If you never plan to use it for its intended use again, that might not matter and it could be a good way of recycling and old device. There might be a setting to limit the maximum charge of the battery. If so, limit it to around 80% and that might extend it.
elbarto777@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Rootiest@lemmy.world 10 months ago
I usually recommend against this particularly if you intend to have the display or camera kept on.
The issue is that modern mobile devices cannot bypass the battery.
This means that when the device draws power it does so from the battery, even if the battery is fully charged and the charger is plugged in.
In that case the device will draw from the battery and the charger will top up the battery. This process, particularly with higher draw or increased heat from the display/camera/etc will cause the battery to wear at a much higher rate than normal use.
If left unchecked in this scenario for long enough this can become a fire hazard as the battery will eventually pillow or puff up. When this happens it makes it very easy to cause a short that will result in a fire. This can even happen on its own if the battery pillowing damages the screen or some other sharp component that then punctures the battery.
Virtually all mobile devices you can still get your hands on will be vulnerable to this issue unless you open them up, remove the battery, and then solder/wire a bypass. Even then you may experience issues with some devices refusing to boot in that configuration.
For that reason it’s generally a better decision to get an SBC or an old laptop/mini-pc instead and if your needs call for it: a touchscreen to go along with it.
Laptops are typically not as susceptible to this. Many relatively new laptops still had removable batteries and will therefore generally work with the battery removed and only a charger attached.
And of course this is not an issue that will occur overnight.
If you want to use a phone temporarily as a touch panel/camera/server then by all means go for it! But I would suggest finding a safer solution if you intend something long-term as any mobile device will eventually become a fire hazard
elbarto777@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Thank you for the explanation.
rar@discuss.online 10 months ago
So the question is: why was it designed this way? Why can’t we bypass the battery to power up the device from the charging cable alone?
r3df0x@7.62x54r.ru 10 months ago
A phone is not a UPS.
elbarto777@lemmy.world 10 months ago
No kidding!
And a UPS is not just its battery.
Now, can you answer the question or not?
spudwart@spudwart.com 10 months ago
No, a UPS uses at least 1 Lead-Acid battery, not LI-ION.
perishthethought@lemm.ee 10 months ago
Does anyone know how long the battery might last in this scenario? Any articles testing this sort of thing? I just searched and couldn’t find any facts, just suggestions / concerns.
knF@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Based on my personal experience at least one year on a 5 years old mobile. It can last longer but I decommissioned it because I got a NUC.
I had setup a charge limiter (between 20% and 80%) with Magisk, initially it was through an automation in homeassistant but the battery usage was very high.
In terms of charge cycles it was one or two per day max
perishthethought@lemm.ee 10 months ago
Thanks. I’m wondering if maybe I could just use something simple like a lamp timer, to control when juice comes through to the phone’s charger/cable. I could enable that only for like 6 hours a day and keep it “off” otherwise.
knF@lemmy.world 10 months ago
That’s a possibility for sure. My suggestion would be first to test the capability of the device before buying anything. Once you’re satisfied with it, you can take the next steps and buy additional hardware. In my experience a USB-C -> ETH port was a great purchase as I was experiencing shaky WiFi connection possibly due to battery saving settings.
r3df0x@7.62x54r.ru 10 months ago
Based on experience, possibly not more then a few months.
PoisonedPrisonPanda@discuss.tchncs.de 10 months ago
For this I would have a plug with timer activated. Just monitor how long it will take to run with one charge and set the timer accordingly.
r3df0x@7.62x54r.ru 10 months ago
That could work but you’re still doing full cycles on the battery all the time. In the end, it might be less then daily use.
bartolomeo@suppo.fi 10 months ago
This is smart, and with the timer you can try to keep the charge between 20 and 80%.
density@kbin.social 10 months ago
timer plugs are so freaking useful. once you have a couple you start noticing things you could do with them. just regular digital non-smart outlet timers. don't get the analogue ones, they ticktickticktick.
PoisonedPrisonPanda@discuss.tchncs.de 10 months ago
I agree, in-house/ living room applications NEED silent timers.