They should offer it seperately.
Well it also includes a streaming music service which are normally $10/m on their own.
indianactresslover@lemmy.world 1 year ago
kirk781@lemm.ee 1 year ago
IIRC, YouTube Music is also offered as a standalone service, Atleast in some countries. However, the difference b/w YouTube Premium and just the Music service comes out to be miniscule, so folks just pay for the former.
indianactresslover@lemmy.world 1 year ago
No, I want Premium without Music. It’s not offered anywhere.
kirk781@lemm.ee 1 year ago
Oh, I understand now, especially the second one. The only thing from Amazon’s product line worth using to me is the Prime delivery service. I can’t give two hoots about their Prime Music( which I lost respect for after it denied to run for me on any browser on Linux for some reason) or Prime Video.
tony@lemmy.hoyle.me.uk 1 year ago
I can’t see the value in using youtube for music… it’s not like I can watch music videos in my car. That’s worth $0 to me, and I imagine the majority.
ChronosWing@lemmy.zip 1 year ago
Youtube music doesn’t have music videos, not sure what you are talking about. It’s just a clone of play music after they shut it down.
gsfraley@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Fwiw, it’s not videos, it’s a Spotify clone.
KepBen@lemmy.world 1 year ago
If you’ve already got a solution for ad-free music in your car, sure, obviously. Not everybody has that though.
Sylvartas@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I already pay for Spotify. They knew exactly what they were doing when they lumped that shit in YouTube premium