Youtube expenses is Rev share with creators and hosting untold hours of video, over 500 hours uploaded per minute, that others just don’t have to deal with.
tony@lemmy.hoyle.me.uk 7 months ago
Yeah, no… it’s already overpriced.
Paramount + £6.99 Netflix £10.99 (standard) Youtube £12
Makes no sense… they don’t have anything like the production overheads. Stuff like Star Trek and Stranger Things are expensive. ‘10 greatest cat videos’ is not.
nnjethro@lemmy.world 7 months ago
ICastFist@programming.dev 7 months ago
It “makes sense” in that, unlike those two, YT has to deal with thousands of hours of video being uploaded to their servers every minute. What they don’t pay in streaming rights, they pay in storage and bandwidth costs, plus a couple of peanuts for “moderation”, which is probably more expensive in the long run
zwaetschgeraeuber@lemmy.world 7 months ago
you forgot to add spotify which is about 12$
Lord_Logjam@feddit.uk 7 months ago
YouTube Music is included with YouTube Premium though so no need for Spotify if you have YTP.
zwaetschgeraeuber@lemmy.world 7 months ago
yes. thats why i was saying they forgot spotify price in their calculation its still pretty ok price for ytp in relation to spotifys new price jump.
Lord_Logjam@feddit.uk 7 months ago
Ah I see, fair point
ChronosWing@lemmy.zip 7 months ago
Well it also includes a streaming music service which are normally $10/m on their own.
Sylvartas@lemmy.world 7 months ago
I already pay for Spotify. They knew exactly what they were doing when they lumped that shit in YouTube premium
indianactresslover@lemmy.world 7 months ago
They should offer it seperately.
kirk781@lemm.ee 7 months ago
IIRC, YouTube Music is also offered as a standalone service, Atleast in some countries. However, the difference b/w YouTube Premium and just the Music service comes out to be miniscule, so folks just pay for the former.
indianactresslover@lemmy.world 7 months ago
No, I want Premium without Music. It’s not offered anywhere.
tony@lemmy.hoyle.me.uk 7 months ago
I can’t see the value in using youtube for music… it’s not like I can watch music videos in my car. That’s worth $0 to me, and I imagine the majority.
ChronosWing@lemmy.zip 7 months ago
Youtube music doesn’t have music videos, not sure what you are talking about. It’s just a clone of play music after they shut it down.
gsfraley@lemmy.world 7 months ago
Fwiw, it’s not videos, it’s a Spotify clone.
KepBen@lemmy.world 7 months ago
If you’ve already got a solution for ad-free music in your car, sure, obviously. Not everybody has that though.
TheDarksteel94@sopuli.xyz 7 months ago
Depends on how much you use it. I watch Youtube pretty much every day for at least an hour, while using Netflix or other streaming services about once evey few months. I use Spotify every day too, just because I like their app more in some ways.
Atomdude@lemmy.world 7 months ago
If I had to choose, I’d swap my Netflix and Disney+ subscriptions for YouTube. I think I watch YouTube videos about three times as much as Netflix and Disney.
redcalcium@lemmy.institute 7 months ago
Heck, they don’t even pay a good fraction of their bandwidth because they put caching box in your ISP location to reduce loads. This is a huge privilege as ISPs won’t let any random companies run equipments for free in their network, which is one of a huge barrier for any YouTube competitors.
LufyCZ@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 months ago
They might be allowing them to run the boxes for free, but the ISPs are saving money on bandwidth, too.
Get enough users for the ISP to care and they’ll work with you. Otherwise, you probably don’t have all that many users to begin with, so the overhead that maintaining and distributing these boxes would create wouldn’t be worth it anyway.