Comment on Cruise Self-Driving License Revoked After It Withheld Pedestrian Injury Footage, DMV Says
TWeaK@lemm.ee 1 year ago
When DMV asked for footage of that part of the incident, Cruise provided it.
So they were a little sneaky in not presenting all the evidence up front, but they didn’t really withhold it in as bad a way as the title implies.
dellish@lemmy.world 1 year ago
This is why we have “guilt by omission”
TWeaK@lemm.ee 1 year ago
Yes but for that to stick there has to be a clear obligation to present everything. Frankly, I don’t think they lost their licence because of the omission, but because of what happened - this article is just trying to make the story more dramatic. Even the title subtly implies this, the licence wasn’t revoked “because” it withheld footage, but “after”.
wahming@monyet.cc 1 year ago
Anybody reasonable reading the article understands the obligation is there.
TWeaK@lemm.ee 1 year ago
Yeah a reasonable person would decide that on the balance of probabilities here, but we’re talking about the process through which a licence is revoked, which needs to be more concrete.