Comment on Elon Musk Offers to Also Ruin Wikipedia
bunnyfc@kbin.social 8 months agoWikipedia is not the Achilles heel of free access to information. The Achilles heel are the sources: libraries, websites.
Consider donating to the internet archive instead or as well. If the sources are poisoned, Wikipedia just repeats bullshit. It's secondary literature.
IdealShrew@lemmy.world 8 months ago
I’m not sure you know what Achilles heel means
Starglasses@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 months ago
I believe they mean that if Wikipedia dies, we are still able to get proper information from the actual sources.
Wikipedia just summarizes the primary sources.
ram@bookwormstory.social 8 months ago
Wikipedia actually much prefers secondary and even tertiary sources to primary sources. They have rules against original research, and follows the guideline that “secondary or tertiary sources are needed to establish the topic’s notability and avoid novel interpretations of primary sources”. It’s only with exception that primary sources are allowed, in which the primary sources “have been reputably published may be used in Wikipedia, but only with care, because it is easy to misuse them.”
Not disagreeing with you, just a bit of nuance.
emberwit@feddit.de 8 months ago
You don’t just alter facts, logical reasoning and scientific standards.
Starglasses@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 months ago
You can: Ban books, burn papers, delete servers, hack articles, AI creations, talk louder than reality.
wagesj45@kbin.social 8 months ago
Technically, I think they only allow primary sources to be referenced if supported by a secondary source. They have weird and complex rules around that,
emberwit@feddit.de 8 months ago
Wikipedia prefers secondary sources, but I think that is not what Stars meant by primary. Just the sources that Wikipedia itself works with.
jasondj@ttrpg.network 8 months ago
Source: Wikipedia