Isn’t Git kind of naturally federated in a broad sense just by the way it works? As long as someone has the source code they can always create another Git repo and share it.
Comment on Mazda’s DMCA takedown kills a hobbyist’s smart car API tool
aniki@lemm.ee 1 year ago
[deleted]
TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
aniki@lemm.ee 1 year ago
[deleted]TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
Oh okay, how cool. You have piqued my interest, I will check out Gitea for now for sure l. Thanks for the explanation.
atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
Kids these days…
Linus Torvalds rather famously managed Linux patches for decades without a centralized server.
bemenaker@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Absolutely false.
min_fapper@iusearchlinux.fyi 1 year ago
Lol no it wouldn’t. The guy doesn’t want to commit resources to fight this, since it’s a hobby that’s not gaining him anything.
Unless y’all give him enough money to mount a legal defense, no amount of fancy tech will help
A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Oh god.
Federation is going to become the next blockchain thing that people have no idea what it does but insist it’ll fix everything, isnt it?
vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 1 year ago
it already is.
Venat0r@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Except the use case it was designed for is actually used…
Kolanaki@yiffit.net 1 year ago
I think he only means in a literal sense. If the thing is copied a ton of times to several repositories, it becomes harder to expunge it entirely. Legal battles notwithstanding.