I see this sentiment a lot. Why do you think he didnt? Why wouldnt he do both?
Comment on a tale as old as time
kadu@lemmy.world 11 months ago
[deleted]
YoFrodo@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Trekman10@sh.itjust.works 11 months ago
Unless she trespassed there’s nothing illegal. I don’t think she shared a specific address. It IS (was?) against the YT TOS but they only care about what makes returns for Google’s shareholders.
LukeMedia@lemmy.world 11 months ago
His point was that YouTube should not provide her a platform, whether he pursues legal action or not is separate from YouTube giving her a platform. I imagine that if he is planning to pursue legal action, he won’t be publicly talking about that for some time.
kadu@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Gabu@lemmy.world 11 months ago
She’s a known content thief and generally shit person.
kadu@lemmy.world 11 months ago
CanadianCarl@sh.itjust.works 11 months ago
I thought there was laws against this.
Oh shit, here is an article talking about Intending to cause malicious harm to others on and off the platform of YouTube, by Google.Also, it is already illegal, and you can be jailed for doxxing in the state of California.
JayObey711@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Why is that? If she has proven to act irresponsibly on the internet and is empowered by her cloud than all platforms should take a stance. Especially YouTube because that’s her main site. It’s not like her being a dick only happens or will only happen on Instagram.