I see this sentiment a lot. Why do you think he didnt? Why wouldnt he do both?
Comment on a tale as old as time
kadu@lemmy.world 1 year ago
[deleted]
YoFrodo@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Trekman10@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
Unless she trespassed there’s nothing illegal. I don’t think she shared a specific address. It IS (was?) against the YT TOS but they only care about what makes returns for Google’s shareholders.
LukeMedia@lemmy.world 1 year ago
His point was that YouTube should not provide her a platform, whether he pursues legal action or not is separate from YouTube giving her a platform. I imagine that if he is planning to pursue legal action, he won’t be publicly talking about that for some time.
kadu@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Gabu@lemmy.world 1 year ago
She’s a known content thief and generally shit person.
kadu@lemmy.world 1 year ago
CanadianCarl@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
I thought there was laws against this.
Oh shit, here is an article talking about Intending to cause malicious harm to others on and off the platform of YouTube, by Google.Also, it is already illegal, and you can be jailed for doxxing in the state of California.
JayObey711@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Why is that? If she has proven to act irresponsibly on the internet and is empowered by her cloud than all platforms should take a stance. Especially YouTube because that’s her main site. It’s not like her being a dick only happens or will only happen on Instagram.