Comment on Mathematician warns US spies may be weakening next-gen encryption
ryannathans@aussie.zone 1 year agoMy point is that there is a documented listed of supported curves for ECDSA but attempting to use any other safe curve in the list results in a failure. I am not trying to use some arbitrary curve.
If your point is that no safe curve is permitted because the powers that be don’t permit it, TLS is doomed.
eff-certbot.readthedocs.io/en/latest/using.html#u…
The default is a curve widely believed to be unsafe, p256, with no functioning safe alternative.
That’s Bernstein’s website if anyone was wondering
Natanael@slrpnk.net 1 year ago
I run a cryptography forum, I know this stuff, and the problem isn’t algorithmic weakness but complexity of implementation.
All major browsers and similar networking libraries now have safe implementations after experts have taken great care to handle the edge cases.
It’s not a fault with let’s encrypt. If they allowed nonstandard curves then almost nothing would be compatible with it, even the libraries which technically have the code for it because anything not in the TLS spec is disabled.
…stackexchange.com/…/can-custom-elliptic-curves-b…
cabforum.org/baseline-requirements-certificate-co…
CAB is the consortium of Certificate Authorities (TLS x509 certificate issuers)
ryannathans@aussie.zone 1 year ago
Tldr would be that there are no safe ECC curves in TLS? Yet
Natanael@slrpnk.net 1 year ago
P256 isn’t known to be insecure if implemented right, it’s just harder to implement right
fluke@snake.substantialplumbing.repair 1 year ago
The WRC deals with unsafe curves all the time. I think picking a couple of spots on some of their curves at high speed would be interesting. Samir has been known to break some of these…