Comment on 22 Democrats Sponsor a Bill That Could Censor Abortion Info From the Internet
spittingimage@lemmy.world 11 months agoThat was before the internet was five big websites showing content scraped from the other four.
Comment on 22 Democrats Sponsor a Bill That Could Censor Abortion Info From the Internet
spittingimage@lemmy.world 11 months agoThat was before the internet was five big websites showing content scraped from the other four.
Siegfried@lemmy.world 11 months ago
I would argue most of internet is already being censored… probably for good reasons.
themurphy@lemmy.world 11 months ago
“Good reasons” for the people in power.
Siegfried@lemmy.world 11 months ago
You are right, most of it is probably to keep people in power and the servants in line, but there are also a lot of situations in which we actively ask for censorship. Moderators are needed for a reason. Censorship is our only relatively effective tool to counter disinformation campaigns and fake news. Even search engines censor their results either to avoid lawsuits or to prevent certain situations, like someone asking for suicide methods is redirected to sites telling him why life is worth it.
I still understand this is a double edged sword and im not sure if the risks involved with compulsory censorship are worth losing our internet freedom, but I do understand this shit is needed on certain situations
floppade@lemm.ee 11 months ago
In a literal level, this person is not being unreasonable. Facebook moderators and the psychological conditions they face as a result of their work are a good indication of that.