There’s an AI technique called controlnet which can be used to achieve the perfect symmetry.
ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 1 year ago
The image shows perfect spiral symmetry, which suggests it’s not a fully AI generated image. It could be a base AI image that was edited by hand to form the spiral though.
The same base was likely used for shutterstock.com/…/surreal-infinity-time-spiral-s… as well. Same ‘squiggles’ it seems.
Online ‘AI art detectors’ are terrible and rarely accurate, so I wouldn’t consider that as proof of anything.
This person has made more images in this style, I wonder how old the oldest one is (since this is one of the most recent ones). If the oldest similarly-styled one is too old, then it would be evidence that the image is likely not AI generated.
jdaxe@infosec.pub 1 year ago
ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 1 year ago
It can also be done with Photoshop. For the record, I’m not claiming it wasn’t AI-generated or at least AI-assisted, I’m just saying there’s no real proof either way.
samus12345@lemmy.world 1 year ago
[deleted]ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 1 year ago
There is no proof that that image was AI-generated. Various elements seem like regular old Photoshop techniques. That image could still be AI-generated or AI-assisted, but there’s no real proof either way.
samus12345@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Yeah, I didn’t read your comment closely enough before posting the reply. It does looks extremely AI-generated, but it’s always possible the artist just isn’t very good.
Smoogs@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I think you’re giving Disney too much credit here. Stealing from shutter stock while suing everyone over anything and pretending they are the victims is their brand. They are known for stealing even from artists they wont even hire. Olaf cough
“It’s a small small world after all…”
SCB@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Why care about reality when you can just instead confirm your own biases? Reality is overrated anyway.
echodot@feddit.uk 1 year ago
Yeah but we don’t know it was AI generated so it’s all just made up bullshit unless you can provide some evidence.
As far as I can tell all of the evidence provided is extremely dubious, and that’s giving it the most positive interpretation. If I was being fair I’d say it’s basically non-existent.