Comment on Net neutrality’s court fate depends on whether broadband is “telecommunications”

hperrin@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

• Aidinthel@reddthat.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  I had the same question, so for anyone who doesn’t want to dig through the article:

  To defend its 2017 repeal of net neutrality rules, the Pai FCC argued that broadband isn’t a telecommunications service because Internet providers also offer DNS (Domain Name System) services and caching as part of the broadband package. A judge said the Pai FCC was entitled to deference on this opinion—even if it didn’t make a lot of sense.

  Basically, Trump’s lackeys legally altered the classification to screw the American people and the question is whether the Supreme Court will go along with this blatant nonsense.

  source

  • hitmyspot@aussie.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    And telephones use numbers and they print phone books. Lol. That’s just ridiculous. It seems on the face of it to be a purposeful misinterpretation to skirt the law. Could there be consequences for that?

    source

    • abhibeckert@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Could there be consequences for that?

      In theory, yes. In practice… Ajit Pai is a lawyer and he’s probably smart enough to avoid doing anything that is blatantly illegal. Or at least, avoid doing anything that would leave behind an evidence trail that could see him taking the fall for anything illegal.

      source

      • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Plenty of lawyers don’t really know what they’re doing, especially in Trump’s orbit. I wouldn’t be surprised if he was just betting on being on the side of political power and being able to get away with it.

        source
  • Takumidesh@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    And cell service isn’t telecommunications because they offer caller ID and voicemail.

    What stupid logic.

    source
  • jaybone@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Why does offering DNS somehow matter?

    source

    • vector_zero@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      I’m not saying I agree with it, but it kind of makes sense in a roundabout way. If you’re resolving domain names and routing traffic to those domains, rather than simply routing traffic, then you’re providing a more complete service.

      I’d equate it to a phone company that includes a human operator as part of the service bundle, as opposed to you having to dial the numbers manually.

      source
  • SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Why didn’t anyone sue when this ridiculous reclassification happened under Pai? If there was a lawsuit and it failed, I should hope this sane reclassification prevails. But we don’t have a very partisan court system right now.

    source