The problem is, and this happens a lot in science, often it takes so long for scientists to be vindicated they die poor and in disrepute. If the pandemic had never happened she may have gone the same way.
Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Good that she had the determination to continue. The great thing is that she was vindicated because it turned out she was right. In science being right is what ultimately matters.
I’m guessing she will never have similar problems in the future.
Edgelord_Of_Tomorrow@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Cryophilia@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Being wrong is just as important in science, imo
Right or wrong, it’s all data
NightAuthor@lemmy.world 1 year ago
#NormalizePublishingNegativeResults
winterayars@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
She may not, but i wonder how many other incredible technologies are being held back for effectively political reasons.
zik@lemmy.world 1 year ago
The thing is she randomly got lucky and proven right due to a pandemic no-one expected. There are a lot of scientists out there who were also right but never had that luck.
Misconduct@startrek.website 1 year ago
Randomly got lucky? What lol. Other scientists not being noticed doesn’t in any way invalidate her. How absurd
NightAuthor@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I think they’re just trying to say, even if you’re right, you can still get screwed over. She just happened to get lucky in having a solid real world situation to help vindicate her.
Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Gabu@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Whew, lads.