Comment on What technological mega project is practical to build today?

• LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  What’s west of Chicago though? That line makes sense on its own merits but if you want coast to coast, a southern route might make more sense.

  source

  • captainlezbian@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    A southern route makes sense in a lot of ways but on the east you have two problems with a southern route: very few major population centers, and all of them are in or surrounded by land that’s not great for rail construction either due to mountains like Nashville or due to swamps like New Orleans and Florida. You’d probably hit Atlanta then there’s little reason to go all the way to the coast at savannah.

    Part of the goal of an initial route is for it to demonstrate that best case scenario it will be usable, and connecting the biggest and third biggest cities in the country is useful, as well as the fact that because it’s nyc at the end it provides easy access to the northeastern Amtrak network which is the only well developed intercity passenger rail system in the United States. The fact that there’s basically nothing from Chicago

    An alternative route might be the mid country route of dc to San Francisco by way of Columbus, Denver, Indianapolis, St. Louis, and a few others. It’s a lot of cities of reasonably large size and even would hit Sacramento. From there you can basically build out triangles to Denver or St. Louis on the coasts. The Appalachian mountains are a pain still, but they’re nothing compared to the Rockies and the population density means crisscrossing them is probably worth it, while the west coast can have their population bubbles all connected on their end.

    Really as a Midwesterner I’m mostly concerned about getting the Great Lakes Region connected into Amtrak because we have every reason to be and it would be a huge deal to have easy access from Ohio and Indiana to both Chicago and the east coast

    source

    • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      As much as I would love that central route (I live in Sacramento) crossing the Rockies and the Sierras seems almost insurmountable for high speed rail. The mountains of the southwest are a lot more isolated, so that’s why I see that as more viable.

      But yeah realistically we need to look at connecting regions first, then once we have two robust networks in the west and east, we can determine the best way to connect them.

      source