Not from what I’ve seen on some gore videos
Comment on Driverless Cruise car runs over woman hit by another driver
stopthatgirl7@kbin.social 11 months agoI think the problem here is more that it parked on her after hitting her. Presumably a human wouldn’t have done that.
Drbreen@sh.itjust.works 11 months ago
money_loo@lemdro.id 11 months ago
Do you think it would have been better to continue driving over someone? What would you like the car to do after a person is thrown under it? Hover mode?
stopthatgirl7@kbin.social 11 months ago
It would have been better to not PARK ON HER LEG. They had to lift the car off her.
It couldn’t have avoided hitting her, but it could have not stopped ON her.
FaceDeer@kbin.social 11 months ago
Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good. Going "I just hit someone, I'm going to shut down everything and wait for people to come fix this" is a better general approach than "I just hit someone, better back up to make sure I'm not parked right on top of them." That second approach could lead to the vehicle dragging the victim, driving over them a second time, or otherwise making things much worse.
PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 11 months ago
Driving over someone’s leg a second time is a great way to make sure it’s broken.
Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world 11 months ago
It’s not like the car can’t be controlled, if driving off was deemed the correct action, they could have gotten them to over-ride and drive the car off. Driving off is almost never the recommended action in these cases.
Lifting off is by far the safer choice.
MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 11 months ago
One is already parked on the leg, sure. But during the accident continuing on in the initial impact to go over the leg (hopefully with just the front tire. Would’ve been preferable. But also that’s a very weird edge case that i imagine there were no sensors for, and a human could’ve made the exact same mistake in trying to brake before hand but not quite making it and inadvertently parking on the victim instead.