Comment on Readers prefer ChatGPT over Wikipedia

Maajmaaj@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

• Taleya@aussie.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  IDK - ask a question and immediately get a (percieved) answer, or RTFM.

  Not shocked people are going for the former

  source
• BubblyMango@lemmy.wtf ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  ChatGPT is more concise, something wikipedia doesnt excel at by design.

  source

  • hubobes@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    It is also often just plain wrong…

    Also there is simple.wikipedia.org

    source

    • BubblyMango@lemmy.wtf ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      It is, but thats the compromise - less reliability for more comfort. Its not “stupid”, its just a compromise.

      source

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Compromises can be stupid

        source
  • Maajmaaj@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Concise and high as fuck on mushrooms a lil too often for my liking.

    source