There are many access points that are not routers.
there is not much wifi access points that are not routers at the same time and i doubt that said regulation would make such a minor a distinction.
unfortunately we can only guess, because only official document i have found is as vague as the news reports.
www.fcc.gov/supplychain/coveredlist
Routers^ produced in a foreign country, except routers which have been granted a Conditional Approval by DoW or DHS.
EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks ago
There are. Just need to shop in the business side of the store and not consumer. At worst pro-sumer.
14th_cylon@lemmy.zip 3 weeks ago
there are some but they are definitely in the minority. also this regulation is focused on home and soho devices, it specifically mentiones tp-link, which is really not enterprise brand.
pishadoot@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
You’re being pretty stubborn about your positions but you’re misinformed/ignorant.
There are SO many Wi-Fi access points that aren’t routers, but a combo router is what most home users buy or get from their ISP. So that’s what you think is “most” when in reality the consumer market is dwarfed by commercial.
TP-Link has Omada which is not as enterprise as CISCO but it definitely supports small and medium sized businesses, which are at the greatest risk to vulnerabilities due to low IT department skills.
cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 3 weeks ago
Access points and routers are usually separate once you get away from the consumer grade stuff. The people that run OPNsense at home often use MikroTik or Ubiquiti access points.
14th_cylon@lemmy.zip 3 weeks ago
also i don’t think there is single mikrotik that can’t function as a router. the fact you can configure them as software bridge does not change that.
the rest answered here: