onlinepersona@programming.dev 1 year ago
Goverments should have their own fediverse instances and delete all their twitter accounts 🤷
Xatolos@reddthat.com 1 year ago
[deleted]gsfraley@lemmy.world 1 year ago
It’s not…? It’s literally just another social media site, it doesn’t hook into ActivityPub or any cross-broadcast protocol. I don’t know why you’re throwing around the word “fediverse” here.
dabaldeagul@feddit.nl 1 year ago
It is a fork of Mastodon though, iirc. But I don’t think it federates with anything.
onlinepersona@programming.dev 1 year ago
Nah, more like this social.network.europa.eu
mp3@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
Same for news organizations. Give the option for reporters that leave or join the organization to migrate their account (aka keep their followers).
That way they provide a proof of authenticity for their reporters by being hosted on their Mastodon instance. Obviously, the instance shouldn’t let the public create an account there, only follow from another instance.
onlinepersona@programming.dev 1 year ago
That does make a lot of sense!
FooBarrington@lemmy.world 1 year ago
This is a very strange comparison, considering Truth Social is not owned by any government.
Xatolos@reddthat.com 1 year ago
[deleted]FooBarrington@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I don’t think @onlineperson meant this as “host their own social network”, but as “host their own micro-messaging platform to release news which is part of the fediverse”. This would make them resilient against PoS like Musk, while making their news accessible to a wide variety of users.
HawlSera@lemm.ee 1 year ago
I think they will and the history books will say “In retrospect, having politicians use a privately owned platform to speak to their constituents was a bad call, as Traitor and Child Murderer Elon Musk demonstrated.”