This is being baked in because of US law. I wouldn’t be surprised if the US made some federal laws requiring your religion in the near future.
There’s a big difference between data collection and government mandated identification.
This is being baked in because of US law. I wouldn’t be surprised if the US made some federal laws requiring your religion in the near future.
There’s a big difference between data collection and government mandated identification.
NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 4 hours ago
And that is why it is a slippery slope fallacy. Eventually, superpowers are going to want to have access to your machines (they already do, but mostly in isolated cases). So any kind of data storage and overrides should be destroyed. So let’s go shred our hard drives and remove the concept of sudo/root access?
kurwa@lemmy.world 4 hours ago
People can run secure systems that share minimal info. This requires all systems to store and share specific info. So you’re making it illegal to have a private system. Sure most people don’t, but now you’re making it illegal. You think that’s okay because we don’t have good privacy laws right now? You want to give up?
NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 4 hours ago
And those generally aren’t the machines you want to connect to the internet and use for all your everyday browsing.
Specific, unverified, info. That you are already sharing in most of the situations where it is being asked for.
A lot of things are illegal. Without the third party verification requirement, you are perfectly fine to hardcode that to say you were born on June 9th, 1969 by default. And that complies with the California legislation (last I read through it).
No. I want people to actually understand what is going on so that they can actually protect themselves.
kurwa@lemmy.world 4 hours ago
How do you want people to protect themselves?