Nemo@slrpnk.net 20 hours ago
look I like bumping the fediverse as much as the next person but not enough to make an image post for textual content
I have some ethical standards
Nemo@slrpnk.net 20 hours ago
look I like bumping the fediverse as much as the next person but not enough to make an image post for textual content
I have some ethical standards
Ek-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.social 20 hours ago
What’s unethical about it?
calcopiritus@lemmy.world 19 hours ago
It’s a hyperbole. It’s not unethical. But many people don’t like it/hate it.
There’s probably many more points.
Ek-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.social 18 hours ago
The post will get ZERO traction if it’s not a image post, I’ve tried.
Did you read what my post was about?
calcopiritus@lemmy.world 17 hours ago
I’m not saying that you shouldn’t do what you do. You just asked why someone would be against doing an image post when it could be a text post and I answered.
What you are doing cannot be done with text posts because of reason 2 and 3.
Skavau@piefed.social 19 hours ago
To be clear, Ek is talking about posting image posts on Reddit who allow video uploads. I don’t think this is a problem there. Moreover, the infographics are more successful at getting attention than just plain-text comment-posts. It is what it is.
elephantium@lemmy.world 11 hours ago
Content-Encoding: gzipwould like a word.sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 4 hours ago
Just cringe for us oldheads