Maybe “it’s not needed yet” is more accurate.
Comment on ReFS is better than NTFS, but Microsoft refuses to let regular users have it
fox2263@lemmy.world 2 months agoYet?? They’ve been making it since the Stone Age. I read about it in my teens
Brkdncr@lemmy.world 2 months ago
fox2263@lemmy.world 2 months ago
They’ve edged us a few times. I’m sure it was supposed to come with vista
undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch 2 months ago
Right? I’ve gone through ReiserFS, ext3, ext4, XFS, ZFS; hell on macOS I’ve been through HFS+ and AFS. And clunky ol’ Microsoft is still on fucking NTFS.
Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 months ago
Why change it if it works?
What is so bad about NTFS?
undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch 2 months ago
Why use NTFS if FAT32 works?
Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 months ago
Because 4GB file limit?
CoriolisSTORM88@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Apple’s APFS I am not a fan of. I have been using Macs since 2008-ish. In all my HFS+ days, I’ve never lost an entire drive. I rebooted my M2 Mac Mini via command prompt, and my external APFS drive is corrupted. Never had that problem before APFS. And since I’m an idiot, I’ve got to pay DiskDrill to hopefully recover the data when I get a larger drive on hand.