Yet?? They’ve been making it since the Stone Age. I read about it in my teens
Comment on ReFS is better than NTFS, but Microsoft refuses to let regular users have it
Brkdncr@lemmy.world 1 day ago
It’s not ready yet. It’s good for some specific use cases but it’s not anything the typical end user needs.
fox2263@lemmy.world 1 day ago
undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch 1 day ago
Right? I’ve gone through ReiserFS, ext3, ext4, XFS, ZFS; hell on macOS I’ve been through HFS+ and AFS. And clunky ol’ Microsoft is still on fucking NTFS.
Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 hours ago
Why change it if it works?
What is so bad about NTFS?
Brkdncr@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Maybe “it’s not needed yet” is more accurate.
fox2263@lemmy.world 1 day ago
They’ve edged us a few times. I’m sure it was supposed to come with vista
RedEyeFlightControl@lemmy.world 1 day ago
This. NTFS is still the gold standard for stability. ReFS is meant for data ops, and while it’s fairly stable, and offers a lot of advantages, it’s not perfect and can suffer greatly if used incorrectly. Until the quirks are gone, users are probably better off with NTFS for a lot of reasons.