Comment on Dumb glasses
lumen@feddit.nl 3 days agoLook, taking such glasses into a locker room is a problem. But someone wearing them in public is not. Anyone punching someone who does that should be taken to jail, simple as that.
Comment on Dumb glasses
lumen@feddit.nl 3 days agoLook, taking such glasses into a locker room is a problem. But someone wearing them in public is not. Anyone punching someone who does that should be taken to jail, simple as that.
NoForwadSlashS@piefed.social 3 days ago
What about if we jail the people who wear spycams in public first? Then there won’t be any violence.
lumen@feddit.nl 3 days ago
And would you make an exception for journalistic purposes? Serious question.
jaybone@lemmy.zip 2 days ago
I’d say there are some valid use cases. Like sports? Biking, skiing, anywhere you might use a GoPro. This might work for sports where it is impractical to wear a GoPro. Also if they did this right, if it had a decent hud and zoom, this could be really helpful for the visually impaired or for other disabilities or medical conditions. That’s where these would be really helpful to society. But they never focus on that kind of shit. Instead it’s tech bros who want to sell this as a gimmick people can record themselves fucking, or stupid shit in the bar for their TikTok.
lumen@feddit.nl 2 days ago
But how do you draw the line between good and bad use cases? Even trying to draw that line brings you on a fast lane to totalitarianism.
petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 days ago
You can license journalists, same way we do automobile drivers.