Comment on An investigation of the forces behind the age-verification bills

misk@piefed.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

• Cethin@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  To all the people saying “but have you checked if it’s wrong”, think about what that implies. Someone can generate way more garbage using an LLM than you can verify. If we need to check it all first, before dismissing it, that means we need to just accept all LLM garbage, because it’s practically impossible to check it all. No, it should be dismissed first, and someone can check it to tell if it’s accurate. I don’t care that it supports your biases. This is much larger than that.

  source
• BrikoX@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  See Methodology and Tools: tboteproject.com/git/hekate/attestation-findings

  source

  • misk@piefed.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Looks like I was right. Why repost this? I don’t believe this was ever truly reviewed by a human and Lemmy users won’t do it since most won’t read past the headline.

    source

    • orionsbelt@midwest.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      since you were right, can you review it for us? since we won’t read past the headlines & you want to be right, might as well dig in, no? let us know what you find in your review! thanks!

      source

      • misk@piefed.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        Why would I make this effort if the autor likely didn’t? If they did all the required research they wouldn’t need an LLM in the first place.

        source
    • BrikoX@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Are you disputing any of the listed external sources? Part of it is governments own federal fillings.

      source

      • misk@piefed.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        Yes, because those sources weren’t read by a human. They could state one thing while the LLM hallucinates another.

        source

        • -> View More Comments