Comment

Come on, don’t water down that term. For her species she was fully developed. He was a possessive creep but not a pedophile.

Sort:hotnew top

Zorque@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
It’s not the internet if we don’t make broad generalizations for the sake of moral pseudo-superiority.

source
Archangel1313@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
She was 2 years old.

source
- kieron115@startrek.website ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
  Pedophilia has to do with physical appearance (attaction to prepubescence).
  
  She was like 20-25% of the way through her lifespan.
  
  Saying “she was 2 years old” would only mean something if she had a similar developmental cycle to humans.
  
  source
  - Archangel1313@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
    Pedophilia is an age thing. You can try to normalize it all you want, but it just comes off sounding like a Lolicon argument. “She’s physically mature at that age”, sounds a lot like “But she only looks like a child…she’s actually 200 years old.”
    
    source
    kieron115@startrek.website ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
    Fuck off, I’m quoting definitions from the DSM-5 and the ICD-11 - not trying to “normalize” a psychological disorder. Go back to reddit.
    
    source