Comment on Uber is letting women avoid male drivers and riders in the US
sneakypersimmon@lemmy.today 7 hours agoWhat in the 4B are your comments here?
Comment on Uber is letting women avoid male drivers and riders in the US
sneakypersimmon@lemmy.today 7 hours agoWhat in the 4B are your comments here?
HalfSalesman@lemmy.world 7 hours ago
I’m a dude.
I’m just saying it straight. Both men and women would be happier if we had fewer men added to the population.
sneakypersimmon@lemmy.today 7 hours ago
I think you’re trolling and trying to make women who support this look sexist.
HalfSalesman@lemmy.world 6 hours ago
I’m not trolling, though perhaps I am being provocative.
That said, I would be unironically in favor of the policy I am proposing.
I’m also open to better systemic policy propositions.
sneakypersimmon@lemmy.today 6 hours ago
Population control and eugenics tend to be bad ideas.
I’m still convinced you’re here to make feminists and women who support safety measures for other women look sexist with your “provocative” views on men.
WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 7 hours ago
Let’s be honest, things would flip after a bit of peace with few men, and women would start to violence each other, then the narrative would kick in that men would not have done that (whether it’s true or not).
Humans will never be happy, and always find reasons to hate each other.
Best to just reduce humans to a population of 800.000 and spread them out as much as possible. Just make everyone sterile, the problem will solve itself. If they can colonize Mars, or live on spaceships or something, that could work too for reducing the effective population.
That would make every single human invaluable, so they would have to treat each other far better. It would also be easier to pivot the population towards something better, and it would also make it easier for say, so species that is not a fuck up to take over. But we would have to somehow explicitly engineer that species to be almost angelic.