Comment

Comment on How Much Do LLMs Hallucinate in Document Q&A Scenarios? A 172-Billion-Token Study Across Temperatures, Context Lengths, and Hardware Platforms [TLDR: 25%]

<- View Parent

Scipitie@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

That’s my problem: any single word humanizes the tool in my opinion. Iperhaps something like “stochastic debris” comes close but there’s no chance to counter the common force of pop culture, Corp speak a and humanities talent to see humanoid behavior everywhere but each other. :(

source

Sort:hotnew top

Telorand@reddthat.com ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
We do enjoy pareidolia, don’t we?

source
- deranger@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
  Paredolia just means seeing patterns that aren’t there, it’s not implicitly human. If you see a dog in the clouds, that’s paredolia.
  
  source
  - Telorand@reddthat.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
    Great, when did I say otherwise? Pareidolia is a thing humans do, because we like patterns. Finding patterns is something that has benefited our species, but it is sometimes so strong that we see faces in electrical outlets or the shape of a car’s front profile (for example).
    
    source
    deranger@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
    I mean, it doesn’t really follow given the context. Nobody is talking about the visual sense, they’re talking about humanizing AI, which isn’t paredolia.
    
    source
    -> View More Comments