Dude, I have been promoting copyright law being changed and being shorted for 25 fucking years, eat shit.
Do you even know who Rufus Pollock is or anything about his research into copyright lengths? Because I was around when that shit was published. I hosted DJ Danger Mouse’s Grey Album on Grey Tuesday as a fuck you to the Beatles copyright holders since the Grey Album should have been considered fair use as it was released for free with no profit at all. I was part of the Kopimi collective.
Not wanting corporations to get a pass while we all get fucked is not the same thing. You’re not being mean, you’re being obtuse.
lmmarsano@group.lt 12 hours ago
Grimy@lemmy.world 16 hours ago
None of that matter if, right now, you are cheering on copyright laws.
SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 hours ago
You repeating that I am cheering them on does not make it true. Get some reading comprehension.
Grimy@lemmy.world 16 hours ago
Do you hope Meta or the copyright industry wins this case? Maybe I misunderstood.
SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 hours ago
There isn’t a good winner in this, both outcomes suck, but one slightly less than the other. If Meta wins, it will not trickle down to regular people’s usage of bittorrent being considered fair use, I can guarantee you that. If the copyright holders win, the outcomes still sucks, but at least large corporations will be held to the same standards as regular people instead of having another exception carved out for corporations to be able to do what is considered a crime for regular people.
There isn’t a movement to change copyright like their used to be. There isn’t a viable North American Pirate Party. Those days are gone, and have been for a long time. I remember the movement and how big it was for a while. We never got mainstream acceptance or appeal and we all started getting old and young people stopped paying attention for the most part.
Like I said, I’d rather copyright law be changed, but that’s not what will happen here. You don’t get new laws crafted out of court case wins and losses, that’s not how this works, laws are crafted in congress.
Meta is running all this on the claim that they need this to train their AI, which is all fine and good, but them winning won’t make it so I can make the same claim if I get caught pirating. Why? Because the copyright lawyers will argue reasonably that I didn’t pirate enough data to build an AI and so I can’t be held to the same standard as Meta, who absolutely needed thousands of terabytes of data to train theirs. The scales are totally different and the scale of their operation is part of their argument, that because of the scale of their AI, that there’s no way they could conceivably train it without going broke paying copyright holders. If I am caught pirating a 1/1000th of the same data as they are, the copyright holders will claim, very easily, that I cannot possibly be building the same kind of AI that Meta is building, and that I must be held to account because I must not be actually using it for AI.
Meta winning will just make it so there’s another avenue for corporations to do whatever the fuck they want while people like you and me still have to follow draconian absurd copyright laws. Laws are made in congress, and copyright length can only be changed by bills in congress becoming law. The outcome of this court case is bad either way but it is marginally less bad for people like us to at least have corporations held to the same standard we are.
Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 15 hours ago
This is why the left can’t get anywhere. You get one guy yelling “just follow the rules!” but he can’t be heard because you have another guy screaming “smash the state!”
Thats my observation for the day.