Comment on LLMs can unmask pseudonymous users at scale with surprising accuracy
FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 1 day agoMy statement was that AI can be used unmask the individuals that have been redacted. AKA they are anonymized. This paper is all about de-anonomyzing.
I’m unclear on if we’re having a good faith conversation because I thought that would have been very clear from the beginning.
General_Effort@lemmy.world 1 day ago
You said: I’m suggesting that AI can’t do what is claimed or that people with something to prove are not interested in proving something.
You’re also saying: My statement was that AI can be used unmask the individuals that have been redacted. AKA they are anonymized. This paper is all about de-anonomyzing.
I can’t make sense of what you are trying to say.
FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Did you see the “or” in my first statement?
General_Effort@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I still can’t make sense of what you are trying to say.
FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I set up two different, not necessarily exclusive, options. Either it can’t do what they say or it can. If it can’t then that’s one issue. If it can then the people with something to prove aren’t stepping up to show us its potential. There could be multiple motivations behind that. But as it stands right now we just know that it’s not being used to do what they claim.