If he had never read Catcher in the Rye, he most likely wouldn’t have killed John Lennon.
Sue Seagram’s!
Comment on Father sues Google, claiming Gemini chatbot drove son into fatal delusion
I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 14 hours agoIn 1980, John Lennon was shot by a mentally ill man who was convinced to kill Lennon by reading Catcher in the Rye. If he had never read Catcher in the Rye, he most likely wouldn’t have killed John Lennon.
But it is not the fault of Catcher in the Rye. We don’t ban the book, or call the author irresponsible for writing it, because we recognize that the fault lies in the mental illness of the shooter, and that anything could have set him off.
The people who kill themselves because an AI Chatbot told them to are mentally ill. It is their mental illness that killed them, not the chatbot. You can make the claim that if it wasn’t for the chatbot, they wouldn’t have gone through with it, but again, you can say the same thing about Catcher in the Rye. Getting rid of the trigger does not remove the mental illness.
If he had never read Catcher in the Rye, he most likely wouldn’t have killed John Lennon.
Sue Seagram’s!
ToTheGraveMyLove@sh.itjust.works 13 hours ago
That’s a terrible argument. We dont blame the book because Catcher in the Rye didn’t have a conversation with him and tell him to kill John Lennon. That’s the difference.
TwilitSky@lemmy.world 10 hours ago
“We don’t blame the book because Catcher in the Rye didn’t have a conversation with him and tell him to kill John Lennon. That’s the difference.”
Speak for yourself, please.
ToTheGraveMyLove@sh.itjust.works 10 hours ago
Oh, you’re a dumbass huh?
NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 11 hours ago
AI’s can’t have conversations any more than a book can.
dtaylor84@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 hours ago
How is that pedantic point relevant?
NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 5 hours ago
How is it not?
SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 12 hours ago
Berkowitz was told by his neighbors dog to kill people.
TwilitSky@lemmy.world 10 hours ago
Yeah but was that just a lie?