only if it goes viral
Comment on Ars Technica Fires Reporter After AI Controversy Involving Fabricated Quotes
paequ2@lemmy.today 21 hours ago
Whoa. There are actually consequences? ArsTechnica is actually sorry??
nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 hours ago
Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 20 hours ago
No, the worker was fired and the executive whose job title is making sure that the work submitted is correct was not fired.
The executives will get a bonus this year.
rodneylives@lemmy.world 1 hour ago
I think the executive in question is Kyle Orland, who I don’t know personally but I’ve interacted with sometimes. He’s pretty good! Again, as I’ve said elsewhere in this thread, maybe I’m too close. I’ve never worked for either of them, but I’ve encountered them on social media from time to time. I think I interacted with Kyle concerning a Storybundle book once.
echodot@feddit.uk 7 hours ago
Copy editing won’t be an executive’s job. But yeah, they didn’t do the bare minimum which is concerning, it seems to indicate that they may not do the bare minimum on all of their articles. How much stuff went undiscovered?
I’m not going to outright say that journalist shouldn’t use AI to write articles, because it’s basically an enforceable rule, but there should be someone at some point whose ultimate responsibility is to make sure that the articles are at least factual, whether they were written by a human or not. Determining whether a quote is legitimate is pretty easy, you just have to Google the quote, if you can’t find any other sources you start to ask questions. As I said it’s the bare minimum they could have done.
WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 16 hours ago
well of course! they just saved a lot of money on wages, they deserve it!