How would Motorola lock it down? They don’t control it in any way.
Comment on Motorola confirms GrapheneOS support for a future phone, bringing over features
qualia@lemmy.world 1 week ago
What’s the likelihood that Motorola will eventually lock down GrapheneOS though? Imho it’d be a bad move if they did. The FOSS mobile OS community has matured to the point that we don’t need to rely on for-profit monoliths any more. Motorola would be smart to lead the way to where the mobile device economy will be.
ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 1 week ago
qualia@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Oh snap, I misread it as Motorola bought GrapheneOS! This is way better news than I realized! Thx for the clarification. 🫡
Edit: On reflection can FOSS even be bought since it doesn’t have an owner to pay? I’m caught up now.
ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 1 week ago
On reflection can FOSS even be bought
Yes, you can pay developers to stop publishing new changes. Basically hire the people developing it and stop releasing the code. Community can try to still develop it independently.
qualia@lemmy.world 1 week ago
At the limit though they’d have to pay every coder with an interest in that software’s development and enough time for a hobby. I guess they could target distribution like Codeberg but alternatives would eventually fill their place.
dev_null@lemmy.ml 1 week ago
GrapheneOS is open source, Motorola - just like anyone else - can make changes to it before they install it on their devices.
qualia@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Like a locked bootloader and bloat.
ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 1 week ago
That’s not what “lock it down” means.
qualia@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Different tense, I’m not using it in the privacy hardened sense.
darkmogool@feddit.org 1 week ago
Which phones are we using for Graphene OS at the moment? Ah, yeah… Google… well known for its non-profit behaviour… I say: Give me alternatives which we aren’t to try to get rid of in the first place.
qualia@lemmy.world 1 week ago
See: PinePhone (Ubuntu Touch, postmarketOS) for $149-199 via their intl site: pine64.org.
OR
SF’s Librem 5 (PureOS, plus Ubuntu Touch, postmarketOS) for ~$700 via puri.sm.
Both shippable to the US. They’re unpolished OSs and expect delays, but they do exist. The competition will only increase going forward.
darkmogool@feddit.org 1 week ago
Both are alternatives, but not fleshed out as far I know. There is also e/OS, but it’s the same story. So we actually don’t have a viable solution
Also: Why is “shippable to the US” a criterion for FOSS or the rest of the world? You know, there are other Countries on this blue Marble…
qualia@lemmy.world 1 week ago
We’re speaking English and the US is by far the largest demographic for English speakers on BlueSky. The UK is the second closest and represents 5-6x less people. I genuinely wish you luck with how you engage with people in the future.