This is the second post today with an over-the-top reply to a student named Faith but yeah could be real
Comment on Dear Faith I
dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 hours agoI have never worked in academia, but I’ve spent time around academics and have read plenty of emails in both academic and corporate contexts … this particular one looks fake, even if the circumstances of plagiarism are common - this just not seem like how a thesis adviser would address this kind of plagiarism with a grad student
glimse@lemmy.world 2 hours ago
a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world 2 hours ago
Sounds like you would be shocked by the reality if the situation.
sniggleboots@europe.pub 4 hours ago
The way I read is that they forgot to cite sources, so technically it’s plagiarism. I didn’t take it as a bad faith effort of passing off someone else’s work as their own. Otherwise I would agree, I don’t think they’d treat the situation so flippantly.
dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 hours ago
I don’t know, the line “at this rate, the only original part of this thesis is your name” implies the issue is not just failing to cite sources, but having no original thoughts or contributions - maybe it’s exaggeration for humor’s sake, but I definitely did not read this as simply forgetting to cite sources.
sniggleboots@europe.pub 4 hours ago
That’s true
toofpic@lemmy.world 4 hours ago
It’s not “flippantly” - the reviewer’s opinion is there, and the whole message is just a “get your shit together”, but in a more polite and ironical form. It’s not an official or final review yet, but if I would receive it, I’d get the idea of what happens when the paper is officialy submitted.