Comment on Power Games: Who’s driving high power bills?
FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 2 weeks agoRenewables did no such thing - the government subsidies did that.
Comment on Power Games: Who’s driving high power bills?
FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 2 weeks agoRenewables did no such thing - the government subsidies did that.
spiffmeister@aussie.zone 2 weeks ago
You can do a bit better than citing a dude with vested interests. You can even find government sources that roughly agree with you: The AEMC report
However the report also notes that:
Highlighting that renewables do decrease prices. Of course, reducing gas prices would probably also reduce prices.
Also at least for last quarter the [AEMO] (www.aemo.com.au/-/media/files/…/qed-q4-2024.pdf?r…) report that coal and transmission are the driving costs. Negative energy prices were primarily driven by renewables.
FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 2 weeks ago
The AEMO are the biggest vested interest in this. Nothing they say can be taken seriously.
Renewables don’t decrease prices because without transmission and grid-scale storage, which doesn’t even exist yet, it’s basically useless.
spiffmeister@aussie.zone 2 weeks ago
Renewables do decrease prices though? Maybe l2add?
Because that’s literally what the referenced article states? Maybe l2read?
FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 2 weeks ago
As the percentage of renewables increases, power bills increase, not decrease. Have you not been paying attention?