Comment

Comment on How should Lemmy & Piefed handle voting activity from banned/deleted accounts?

If “going against the hivemind” is insulting people (which is what I’ve seen most of the time with users with both warnings), then it works as intended.

Also, giving a lot of downvotes is usually a sign of toxicity, and that’s only based on the user’s actions, not the downvotes they receives.

And does nothing when the toxic users just say on their own instance or comm

As I said, it’s not a perfect tool. To solve toxic users creating their own communities where they reign alone would require admins stepping in. And in the case you mention, when the person is an admin themselves, there isn’t a lot you can imagine, no tool would be able to address that.

source

Sort:hotnew top

goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
There has been many times on lemmy and reddit where that is not the case, just saying what people didn’t like was enough. From games to politics people love to dogpile. Making a system that helps do that is asinine.

Blaze you do so much for the fediverse but defending this type of system is very disappointing to me.

source
- Blaze@piefed.zip ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
  I said it above, but I’ll rephrase:
  
  a user giving way more downvotes than upvotes than is a sign of toxic behaviour (I insist on “giving”, so the user is the only one doing that action, we are not talking about other people’s actions)
  
  every time I see a user with warnings, they have both, meaning that they give a lot of downvotes (see previous points), and indeed get downvoted back
  
  The point you are making with people going against the hivemind is related to people receiving a lot of downvotes, but doesn’t explain people giving a lot of downvotes.
  
  Blaze you do so much for the fediverse but defending this type of system is very disappointing to me.
  
  I indeed do a lot, and I’ve seen toxic users going rampant at a few moments. The lemm.ee shutdown due to trolling and toxicity is a sign that we needed a way to identify bad faith trolls and toxic users better to avoid mods and admins burnout.
  
  source
  - goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
    
    The point you are making with people going against the hivemind is related to people receiving a lot of downvotes, but doesn’t explain people giving a lot of downvotes.
    
    Because it’s treated differently in piefed but still an example of how the software is designed to punish those who do not act the way the creator wants.
    
    It just doesn’t seem like a way to actually address bad faith trolls or bad actors just make it easier to purge. Especially with instances that love to keep those types around, see world and shit just works.
    
    source
    Blaze@piefed.zip ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
    While we are talking, example of a user with the two warnings: https://piefed.zip/u/grimreaper@sopuli.xyz
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
    Blaze@piefed.zip ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
    
    Because it’s treated differently in piefed but
    
    Then Piefed is fine?
    
    Especially with instances that love to keep those types around, see world and shit just works.
    
    Instances who tolerate bad faith trolls or bad actors are going to do so with or without tools such as Piefed’s.
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

giving a lot of downvotes is usually a sign of toxicity

Emphasis mine. When is it not a sign of toxicity? Rules are defined by their exceptions, so I am curious as to how this exception is navigated, if at all?

Essentially someone who posts with high frequency has a capacity to issue more downvotes without compromising this admittedly imperfect tool.

Now I was never really a reddit user, but the problematic karma farming of accounts associated with that place was directly linked to these kinds of tools and metrics, no?

source
- Blaze@piefed.zip ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
  
  Emphasis mine. When is it not a sign of toxicity? Rules are defined by their exceptions, so I am curious as to how this exception is navigated, if at all?
  
  In my experience, it is almost always the case, but I said usually in case someone came up with a very unique situation.
  
  Essentially someone who posts with high frequency has a capacity to issue more downvotes without compromising this admittedly imperfect tool.
  
  Are you saying that because they would get more upvotes, they could offset the downvotes they receive? Potentially, but this is where the second metric comes in (giving a lot of downvotes), and as we said, the two are almost always present at the same time.
  
  Now I was never really a reddit user, but the problematic karma farming of accounts associated with that place was directly linked to these kinds of tools and metrics, no?
  
  Karma farming is an issue when users can see karma as an absolute value. It’s not possible on Piefed, which only shows a percentage of attitude (downvotes given, visible to everyone: https://piefed.zip/u/Blaze ) and reputation (downvotes received, visible only to admins)
  
  source
  - ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
    
    Are you saying that because they would get more upvotes, they could offset the downvotes they receive? Potentially, but this is where the second metric comes in (giving a lot of downvotes), and as we said, the two are almost always present at the same time.
    
    Right, though it’s a mitigating factor. I guess there’s something I don’t know about piefed: Lemmy comments all have a default upvote from the user that makes it. But it can be revoked by the user. Does Piefed work the same way? My thought only applies if that’s the case.
    
    source
    Blaze@piefed.zip ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
    The upvote you give yourself is there, but IIRC it doesn’t count for your score.
    
    While we are talking, this is the kind of users who gets the two warnings: https://piefed.zip/u/grimreaper@sopuli.xyz
    
    source
    -> View More Comments