goferking0
@goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org
- Comment on 17 hours ago:
He’s clearly referring to the people who express what he views as bad faith commentary
Yes, that’s exactly it but aimed at anyone who isn’t talking to them even if rimu already said screw off to them.
My last point as there’s no convincing what appears to be piefeds pr person. Do you think users like this who started another flame war are a good look for piefed?
- Comment on 17 hours ago:
I’d argue that it is more because so many people have hate comms and groups set up specifically to target the lemmy devs. Idk why people hate Des so much
- Comment on 17 hours ago:
The op is complaining about default lemmy ui not being as much like new reddit as default piefed is not that there’s other options
- Comment on 1 day ago:
Piefeds default is images and text are bigger, like a card style while lemmys default is like old reddit and compact.
They’ve got their complaints in multiple comments in this thread but it basically boils down to wanting reddit but not being on reddit. Which also gets to a lot of other complaints about people moving because it’s different than current reddit
- Comment on 1 day ago:
You think that Rimu would jump onto these instances that lets say are mutually ideological hostile and take notes and believe they’re arguing in good faith?
I’m saying they shouldn’t be surprised when no one wants to discuss things with someone who specifically said they don’t want anything to do with them. Which also goes back to the language rimu uses when questioned.
Again are you pr for piefed cause you are way to invested in defending it, doing best to distract from the actual points and issues brought up and seemly instantly responding.
- Comment on 1 day ago:
Weird, I was told to only assume the positives in everything. Shouldn’t they be happy to have people looking and spreading the code?
Now I see the issue its they didn’t do it in pr or only ask in approved spaces (even though most are on instances rimu has blocked). How could they not want to be neutral after having it start with him completely against them.
I mean he’s been accused of running a CIA-style op (or compared to).
I’m not sure what else they would expect when starting by explicitly banning leftists from the space they are currently in.
- Comment on 1 day ago:
Hostility by simply doing code reviews and questioning odd design choices?
Or hostility like the lemmy devs face constantly?
- Comment on 1 day ago:
They seem to want new reddit ui and not understand most hate that ui/ux
- Comment on 1 day ago:
Because so many keep getting told it’s by tankies and stop thinking immediately after that
- Comment on 1 day ago:
So you do/can see the hostility from the language used. So piefed pr
- Comment on 1 day ago:
Again it’s behave as I want and you have to talk to me or it’s bad.
Am I talking to rimu now? Or just pr team?
- Comment on 1 day ago:
No it’s their stance anyone reading the code has to talk with rimu or there’s no way the person can understand it.
- Comment on 1 day ago:
Which again doesn’t change how others would perceive the language used.
- Comment on 1 day ago:
Piefed just reminds me too much of sublinks where people simply hated the devs so instead of helping improve the software or even fork it just started fresh on something new.
None of the Piefed users ever said Piefed was perfect, that the code was elegant, or that there were no issues with filters such as the the three examples I listed above.
I’d argue poor code will cause issues as users increase, both for instance admins and user performance.
Overall the issues brought up keep coming back to piefed bringing in some of the worst parts of reddit to the fediverse, like the reputation system. It’s designed how rimu wants people to interact in specific ways. And does not seem to care if it actually works with other non piefed instances.
- Comment on 1 day ago:
Because I’m a cynical pet and keep seeing odd decisions made along with language that 80% of the time points to bad things.
- Comment on The TV industry finally concedes that the future may not be in 8K 2 days ago:
Most enterprise places are 1080p default and reqi people to go above and beyond to justify 4k screens.
Then we get into laptop’s still barely going about 720p so a lot of people have no idea what 4k would even bring them as even most streaming content still only in 1080 so not really noticeable for those who even have 4k screens
- Comment on 2 days ago:
As i asked there, which is the 4chan image blocking as the checks there simply say images from 4chan cause reputation loss.
I know you are amazing at promoting the fediverse but feels odd to see you ignore all the issues people bring up about piefed
- Comment on 2 days ago:
I know, but you also can’t see anything but positives from anything they do
- Comment on 2 days ago:
It reads as being upset anyone would dare read it. Especially with replying to the person pointing it out they wouldn’t review anything they thought was intentional coded in a particular way.
Note this is completely separate from by stance after reading some of the code and stance of the level of it.
- Comment on 2 days ago:
Except that is exactly how it reads.
ignore everyone else looking at the code because they’re amateurs as we’re the only professionals here
- Comment on 2 days ago:
Been looking to migrate off .ml,
Why out if curiosity?
- Comment on 2 days ago:
Love that the respose ignores every point just deflects again to a completely different topic
- Comment on 2 days ago:
Notice the quote from them specifically saying everyone but us are amateurs.
He isn’t specifically “calling out” anyone directly. All he says here is that the stuff people are complaining about here have been on piefed and not hidden since day zero.
Again he’s linking to the thread calling out others for looking at the code.
And again most are pointing out how terrible the code is and how odd it is for some of the features to exist.
- Comment on 2 days ago:
Here = comm
And lemmy.world/comment/21861362 which leads to
Where both calls anyone but them looking at the code amateurs and can’t understand people wouldn’t provide feedback if thought bad things in code were purposely done as so many projects will do that
There’s no need to listen to rumors and amateur speculation when we’re right here and happy to help. Come on in, the water’s fine!
- Comment on 2 days ago:
Because it’s a piefed feature set.
Based on rimus responses here and elsewhere they do not seem interested in feedback.
Even in their comment linking to a thread saying they welcome it, they were attacking someone providing it
- Comment on 2 days ago:
Sadly refactoring is frowned upon in a lot of places as it takes away from adding new stuff, especially when necessary to prevent the code from getting worse
- Comment on 2 days ago:
Linking so people see it.
Isn’t that the instance of the dev?
- Comment on 2 days ago:
- Comment on Piefed admin settings that allow to enable or disable content filters (they are disabled by default, see body for details) 2 days ago:
Saying the simple code needs lots of context outside of the code block says it’s either not simple or not easy to understand
- Comment on Piefed admin settings that allow to enable or disable content filters (they are disabled by default, see body for details) 2 days ago:
Most of the issues people have brought up have been about why the snippets are even in the code not trying to obscure what the code does.
It completely ignored the context that the do_the_thing function is only called if the admin wants to do the thing
Again it’s why is this a thing