It does more to handle client-side rendering than archive.org, so there are pages that could be rendered by today that were not archivable by org. Also, because of differing usage patterns, it has archives of pages that org didn’t, and even for pages that org does have, at times org doesn’t.
Comment on English Wikipedia bans archive.today
totally_human_emdash_user@piefed.blahaj.zone 6 hours agoIt is not clear to me why archive.today is so important given the continuing existence of archive.org.
CombatWombat@feddit.online 4 hours ago
Tim_Bisley@piefed.social 6 hours ago
Because having one thing is never good. IA goes down then what? Also archive.today captures websites differently which can work in a pinch when IA fails to archive a site.
chaogomu@lemmy.world 5 hours ago
Altering the content of the archive certainly is different. And is undeniably worse.