You named a supposed benefit of what FUTO tries to accomplish with their licensing, but gave an example of a project that has a broadly used license, not specific to FUTO.
Comment on Youtube frontend, Grayjay is coming to Steam
artyom@piefed.social 2 months agoYes I did say open source.
take6056@feddit.nl 2 months ago
hummingbird@lemmy.world 2 months ago
The term open source has lost its original meaning for some time now.
grue@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Which is why using it should be considered harmful and everyone should say “Free Software” instead.
Attacker94@lemmy.world 2 months ago
That is more confusing since free software is a double entendre. The software could be monetarily free, or it could be free to use for development. I think the best way to move forward is to make active attempts to distinguish open source, ie freely modifiable code, & source available, ie code can be viewed but not modified. There are probably some shortfalls here and I would love to hear them, but this is what I have been doing when I talk about software.