Uh oh, if .ml is defending them db0 really is a lost cause.
I don’t see a reason why you should. It’s not like the vote didn’t happen for good reason. There’s no good reason to speak to genocide apologists.
hakase@lemmy.zip 2 weeks ago
mrdown@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
I sm nlt an ml user and I still defend db0. Now what?
monkeyjoe@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
.world user here, I am defending them. Are they a lost cause because they don’t support mass murder or are they are lost cause because they support international justice?
agentant@lemmy.ml 2 weeks ago
I’m actually a Hexbear user. This is my alt.
LeninWeave@lemmy.ml 2 weeks ago
People are going to assume this is a joke, lmao.
agentant@lemmy.ml 2 weeks ago
Yeah to clarify, I wasn’t joking. Hexbear is my main instance.
BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 2 weeks ago
“If ml says genocide is bad, then I support genocide!”
Literally reactionary.
alsaaas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 weeks ago
Congratulations, you just earned yourself the “🤡” user tag!
n0respect@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 weeks ago
Its this kind of bad-faith accusative argument that I hate most, from wherever it comes.
agentant@lemmy.ml 2 weeks ago
I don’t see how it’s bad faith to call an instance that has taken a stance in favor of a genocide "genocide apologist. They are doing genocide apologia. If you aren’t a genocide apologist, you should leave the genocide apologist instance, same as leaving the nazi bar if you aren’t a nazi.
n0respect@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 weeks ago
I have not seen evidence that the plurality of that instance is in favor of genocide. Im open to evidence.