Since you care deeply about truth or something, when will you be correcting your comments that, at best, lack huge amounts of truth that change the contents you put forth? At best, you accidentally skipped multiple paragraphs that contradict your claims. At less best, you knew better.
Comment on Instagram boss: 16 hours of daily use is not addiction
Analog@lemmy.ml 16 hours agoWhat editing? Didn’t edit either if those posts.
XLE@piefed.social 10 hours ago
Analog@lemmy.ml 1 hour ago
Post said he said a thing. He did not say the thing. Not complicated.
Could have worded the post title to be accurate: didn’t. Instead, lied.
Words matter. Truth matters. Interpretation is how you get religious people performing atrocities based on millennia old writings.
“[Asshole] Squirms Under Questioning, Refuses To Admit 16hrs A Day Is Addictive Behavior.”
Not hard.
XLE@piefed.social 1 hour ago
Your comments now are a huge shift from
“That sounds like problematic use,” the Instagram boss answered. He did not call it an addiction.
He also didn’t say it was a tomato.
Seems that, in the interest of accuracy, you should update them, lest you be the thing you claim others are.
Analog@lemmy.ml 1 hour ago
I recommend a re-read, my good buddy, of all my posts in this thread.
Truth. Not lies. Not conjecture.
This can be the truth that he was dodging the question.
Don’t say people said things they didn’t say. Simple.
Doomsider@lemmy.world 16 hours ago
The comments I replied to were heavily edited after I replied. You can comment at the bottom with an Edit: and then explain what you changed. Otherwise, it is known as a ninja edit and it is generally frowned upon because it makes the conversations convoluted. Cheers!