Comment on Stoat removes all LLM-generated code following user criticism
klymilark@herbicide.fallcounty.omg.lol 8 hours ago
Gods. The second I saw that Torvalds used an LLM to generate any amount of code I knew people would be annoying as shit about it. And here we are with people being annoying as shit about it.
chunes@lemmy.world 7 hours ago
Maybe you should try to learn what value Torvalds sees in it then and be a little less knee jerk about it
surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 3 hours ago
Yeah, because it’s nuanced and people suck at nuance.
And his take is reasonable, I think. Use it for unimportant shit that would otherwise waste your time.
cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 2 hours ago
To me, it makes sense for things that are simple to review, have clear, binary acceptance criteria, and little to no meaningful attack surface or dangerous failure modes. If you are trying to make an AI develop a bulletproof filesystem device driver or network stack you’re a fucking maniac and should be pilloried in the town square. If you want to throw an AI-generated github actions build script at me that’s perfectly fine and once I’ve reviewed it thoroughly it doesn’t bother me one bit if it’s AI-generated.
thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world 5 hours ago
Next time you need to go the doctor ask your AI instead please.
klymilark@herbicide.fallcounty.omg.lol 6 hours ago
Where in my comment did I mention my stance on LLM usage? All I said was I knew people would be annoying about Torvalds using LLMs to generate code, and that there was an instance of that here.