I’m really glad to hear that.
Funny that the top comment is a pro AI guy trying to cancel the people who are criticizing it for not being part of the project, when AI by definition does not give care about, or understand, any code it creates.
Submitted 3 hours ago by Beep@lemmus.org to technology@lemmy.world
https://github.com/orgs/stoatchat/discussions/1022
I’m really glad to hear that.
Funny that the top comment is a pro AI guy trying to cancel the people who are criticizing it for not being part of the project, when AI by definition does not give care about, or understand, any code it creates.
Gods. The second I saw that Torvalds used an LLM to generate any amount of code I knew people would be annoying as shit about it. And here we are with people being annoying as shit about it.
Maybe you should try to learn what value Torvalds sees in it then and be a little less knee jerk about it
Transparency increases trust, and this is definitely a step in the right direction.
That’s quite nice, I’ve got to say.
RickyRigatoni@piefed.social 1 hour ago
So many people in the comments butthurt over this decision. Ai generated code is just bad, bro. Nobody wants a program coded by someone who doesn’t understand the output.