Comment on Australia and EU on verge of striking free trade deal long stalled by beef, parmesan and prosecco
wieson@feddit.org 20 hours agoWhat are the ingredients? The cattle breeds of Emilia Romana, the grass that grows there and the water.
I would gladly try aged cheese from Victoria. Called it “Grand Victorious” or “Old Swan Stater” or whatever you like.
But it’s not parmigiano reggiano.
Zagorath@aussie.zone 19 hours ago
Yes, it is. Some dumb fuck ultra conservative European laws don’t change that. Australian law doesn’t currently protect the name, and I can go out right now and buy parmesan cheese that wasn’t made in Italy.
The law changing would make it illegal to keep doing that, but it wouldn’t change reality. Reality being that the type of cheese they sell today is the same as the type of cheese they’re selling in the future.
beeng@discuss.tchncs.de 19 hours ago
Beer, wine, cheese, etc all come from the ingredients and one of those ingredients is usually the water… Which you cannot get the same taste and profile no matter how much you try, unless you’re in the region where it comes from.
Ship it if you want to use it in your cheese
Zagorath@aussie.zone 15 hours ago
If they think their ingredients are so much superior than the same product made elsewhere, they should be fine with calling it “parmesan from Parma”. As it is, in places that respect this form of intellectual property, they’re essentially given a state-backed artificial monopoly that props them up more than their product can earn on its own merits.
beeng@discuss.tchncs.de 9 hours ago
TFW Parma, Feta, Champagne are all places 😆
wieson@feddit.org 16 hours ago
I appreciate your fervour, and I too want Australia and the EU to grow closer and to have a strong foundation of middle powers and free democracies.
Just a short idea about “you can call it parmesan made in northern Italy”. You might want to look up, where the city of Parma is located, from which the cheese gets its name.
I don’t think our countries’ relationship should break on this rock. But just my perspective: I think it’s a battle of culture vs. capitalsm. To the people of Parma, the Parmigiano cheese means quite a lot. If I found out, there was a big cheese maker in my area, I honestly would rather he represented my region in the name, than some Italian region to get a bit more profit.
Zagorath@aussie.zone 15 hours ago
Why would you think I need to look anything up?
I think you’re right that capitalism is involved. But the capitalists are the ones rigidly trying to enforce one of the most ludicrous types of intellectual property. If someone says “parmesan cheese” or “champagne”, I don’t care where it was made. I care about the qualities of the product itself. Which can be made anywhere. All that happens when they restrict it is they’re artificially supporting businesses in one area by giving them a state-sponsored monopoly on an entire class of product.
It’s not super different from trademarks. And while I’m not necessarily in favour of the total abolition of trademarks, I am in favour of legal genericisation being much, much easier. Velcro, frisbee, and bandaid, for example, are so obviously genericised now in practice, they should be legally. Words like parmesan and champagne are no different. Indeed, geographic indicators are always like this, because they by definition can’t be limited in the way a true trademark is.
If the people of Parma believe their parmesan is superior, they should be able to survive by calling it “parmesan made in Parma”. And if they didn’t want their region’s name to be part of the generic name for the product…they shouldn’t have insisted on conflating their region with the type of cheese in the first place.