Didn’t ring already prove
That was Google Nest. Though those cameras always gave you 3 hours to watch back footage, even without a subscription.
Comment on Ring calls off partnership with police surveillance provider Flock Safety
NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net 1 day ago
Didn’t ring already prove they were permanently recording and storing the data from every ring camera even if the person that bought it doesn’t pay for a subscription?
The conspiracy theorists joking/lamenting about how seemingly everyone decided that buying a listening device to put in every room was fine because it had a name, and not long after, the same company known for exploiting its warehouse workers, union busting and general privacy violations brought out the ‘build your own panopticon’ kit.
baru@lemmy.world 1 day ago
kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day ago
Didn’t ring already prove they were permanently recording and storing the data from every ring camera even if the person that bought it doesn’t pay for a subscription?
I have no idea.
atrielienz@lemmy.world 1 day ago
They may have done, but if you’re referring to the kidnapped woman who’s footage was pulled from the backend after they said she didn’t have a subscription, she had a Google Nest Camera.
I wouldn’t doubt that Amazon does this too but Google is just as bad if not worse.