Comment on Recreating uncensored Epstein PDFs from raw encoded attachments

• Qwaffle_waffle@sh.itjust.works ⁨19⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  64

  source
• mEEGal@lemmy.world ⁨22⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Asking the real questions

  source
• hodgepodgin@lemmy.zip ⁨9⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Since there’s 78 pages, I’m guessing at least 1 ambiguity per page? Anyways, it’s dreadfully big.

  source

  • RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    2^78 is large but computers can do an awful lot per second, so if only about some the pages contain attachments 2^40-55 is something you could bruteforce in weeks if you can do millions of attempts a second

    source

    • vatlark@lemmy.world ⁨29⁩ ⁨minutes⁩ ago

      I have never looked into the details of an OCR, but if it’s a classifier it should give the it’s confidence in being a 1 or L so you can start with the low confidence characters.

      source