You’ve spent a lot of effort carving out a gray area in which you can justify raping children.
Comment on The news is sugarcoating how revolting the Epstein files are
Flauschige_Lemmata@lemmy.world 2 days ago
There definitely is such a thing as sex with a child. At least if you count teenagers as children.
If you are within the bounds of the standard creepiness rule, don’t have a position of power and if all parties consent, it’s definitely sex. And that’s not uncommon. Even if many people would like to pretend it is.
Also, if a teenager convincingly lies about their age, I wouldn’t call it rape either.
UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 2 days ago
frizop@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Minor’s can not consent legally.
alaphic@lemmy.world 2 days ago
How dare you interrupt his mental gymnastic exhibition with silly things like logic and facts
Randomgal@lemmy.ca 2 days ago
The logic is they can’t consent practically either. It snot just the law. A kid doesn’t have all the tools to consider the consequences of their actions, without them there can be no consent. Same reason you can’t consent if you’re wasted.
grimpy@lemmy.myserv.one 2 days ago
the Epstein class begs to differ
Hawke@lemmy.world 2 days ago
False.
legaldictionary.net/romeo-and-juliet-laws/
lime@feddit.nu 2 days ago
they’re excluded by the previous two conditions.