I wouldn’t even have anything to destroy if it wasn’t for an LLM. I’d still be using Windows.
Comment on LLM's despite all the flaws it probably made it easier to switch to Linux.
hexagonwin@lemmy.sdf.org 3 weeks ago
except that noobs can destroy their systems very easily by following LLM instructions…
Perspectivist@feddit.uk 2 weeks ago
KokusnussRitter@discuss.tchncs.de 2 weeks ago
I found it quite reliable tbh. Whenever I didn’t u derstand or was worried by the LLMs suggested course of action, I’d ask it to explaine why things should be done. I borked my system many times as a Linux newbie. It was always my fault, bever the LLMs
wabafee@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
To be fair it is the same for random commands in some forums. It’s like tradition at this point LLM just remove the sociatial fear of being shamed.
hexagonwin@lemmy.sdf.org 3 weeks ago
the difference is that LLMs spit out actual bs quite frequently while forums are usually simply outdated or smth
RoidingOldMan@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
When I was a child I’d go on Yahoo Answers and give bad advice and then vote myself as having the best answer. I was a ‘top answerer’ for several niche subjects I know nothing about.
PoastRotato@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
To be fair, if you were taking advice from Yahoo Answers in the first place then you were definitely getting what you paid for.