Always.
But we need to get this huge problem away that always a power hungry dictator gets to power and then it turns into just any dictatorship!!! And not socialism!
Comment on Ubisoft Fires Team Lead For Criticising Stupid Return-To-Office Mandate
DylanMc6@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 hours ago
We need socialism
Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 hours ago
DylanMc6@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 minutes ago
Does it involve letting the party work with industrial unions, rather than the state?
vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 11 hours ago
This huge problem stems from “we need”. Collectivism leads to hierarchy, because a collective isn’t semantically compatible to one person. A collective can’t be responsible, a collective can’t make a decision, a collective can’t think, a collective can’t speak in one voice. But collectivism means trying to treat a collective like one person. Leading to dictatorships.
jjlinux@lemmy.zip 4 hours ago
Finally, someone had to say it. While capitalism is far from perfect, I’d rather have billionaire capitalist assholes that I can then calm on their bullshit than so-called ‘socialism’ which is just the pretty way to call a dictatorship. Show me one ‘socialist’ country that has thrived. One, come on.
TheBlackLounge@lemmy.zip 11 hours ago
You talk as if with corporations a single person can be held responsible…
You can have syndicates and get close to socialism
Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 hours ago
Thats then syndicalism which is a form of socialism
IronBird@lemmy.world 10 hours ago
shit, the average public corporation is a more representative democracy than the US actual government is.
minorkeys@lemmy.world 12 hours ago
Then you have to fight for it.
Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 hours ago
Cooperatives and unions are the future!