Comment on Hydrofoil ferry sets 160-nautical-mile record in longest sea voyage
14th_cylon@lemmy.zip 8 hours agowithout that information the title doesn’t make sense
you could have just said “i don’t understand”. here, let me help you: a ship has set a record under certain condition.
if you have a specific information to add, like that it applies to electric ship, it would be much more useful to add it, instead of asking cryptical questions that does not help anyone, and baselessly accusing the poster of changing the headline. that is, if being useful was your goal.
you are aware that any online server can update their texts, including headlines, and this headline may very well represent the state of the article at the moment it was captured, right? RIGHT?
Also, the original article had a perfectly fine title. It’s pretty standard when posting to keep the title of the original article you’re linking to instead of editorializing it, unless you’re specifically going to fix something and note that.
Here, let me help you: copy, paste.
Also, the original article had a perfectly fine title
and that is based on… ?
editorializing it
your unfounded accusations again.
Your comment was inane, which is why I gave the “no, you”.
inane
oh jeez. i got whole two replies from you, you must be going ad.
inane [ɪˈneɪn]
adjective
lacking sense or meaning; silly:
“don’t badger people with inane questions”
ok, cool, i honestly thought it was a typo, but that doesn’t change my answer. just because my answer breaks your narrative doesn’t make it senseless.
TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 hours ago
If this was a childish behavior contest, you would be winning by a landslide.
Why even attack someone pointing out the title is misleading and wrong? What’s wrong with you.
14th_cylon@lemmy.zip 7 hours ago
it is the person i am reacting to, who attacked the original poster, in the first sentence that came out of their mouth, without a grain of evidence.
TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 hours ago
Ok, let me explain what the evidence is:
Is it really that hard to get that?
I clicked on the post as I thought it’s bullshit as I, who served in the navy for 15 years, did much more than 160Nmi without refueling many times. But apparently it’s about a record for an electric boat, as clearly states in the original article’s title. So the post’s title changed the original title to clickbait.
But why is it triggering you so much that someone points that out? So much so you have to insult them as being childish? While at the same time behaving childish yourself. Are you just trolling for attention?
14th_cylon@lemmy.zip 1 hour ago
that is not how evidence works. articles on the web and their content are routinely updated after publication. it is far more logical than that someone took the headline and intentionally changed one word to piss you off, because… why tf would someone do that?
why is it triggering you so much when someone say “don’t make stupid accusations without proof”?
Yoddel_Hickory@piefed.ca 6 hours ago
Well yeah there evidence, the title doesn’t match the article.
Why are you so angry?
Many communities here have a rule to keep the original title, and even out of those it is good form.
But I must repeat: why are you so angry? Is this just how you are or does this reply really make you this angry?
14th_cylon@lemmy.zip 59 minutes ago
that is not how evidence works. articles on the web and their content are routinely updated after publication. it is far more logical than that someone took the headline and intentionally changed one word to piss you off, because… why tf would someone do that?
why do you think that “don’t make accusations without proof” is sign of anger? what does it say about you, hm? i must repeat: what does it really really say about you? 😂