Comment on Hydrofoil ferry sets 160-nautical-mile record in longest sea voyage
JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca 2 hours agoIt’s missing key information, and without that information the title doesn’t make sense, and kind of isn’t as interesting. Now read your comment as if I wrote it back to you.
14th_cylon@lemmy.zip 1 hour ago
you could have just said “i don’t understand”. here, let me help you: a ship has set a record under certain condition.
if you have a specific information to add, like that it applies to electric ship, it would be much more useful to add it, instead of asking cryptical questions that does not help anyone, and baselessly accusing the poster of changing the headline. that is, if being useful was your goal.
you are aware that any online server can update their texts, including headlines, and this headline may very well represent the state of the article at the moment it was captured, right? RIGHT?
TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 hour ago
If this was a childish behavior contest, you would be winning by a landslide.
Why even attack someone pointing out the title is misleading and wrong? What’s wrong with you.
14th_cylon@lemmy.zip 37 minutes ago
it is the person i am reacting to, who attacked the original poster, in the first sentence that came out of their mouth, without a grain of evidence.
Yoddel_Hickory@piefed.ca 6 minutes ago
Well yeah there evidence, the title doesn’t match the article.
Why are you so angry?
Many communities here have a rule to keep the original title, and even out of those it is good form.
But I must repeat: why are you so angry? Is this just how you are or does this reply really make you this angry?
JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca 1 hour ago
Also, the original article had a perfectly fine title. It’s pretty standard when posting to keep the title of the original article you’re linking to instead of editorializing it, unless you’re specifically going to fix something and note that.
Here, let me help you: copy, paste.
14th_cylon@lemmy.zip 40 minutes ago
and that is based on… ?
your unfounded accusations again.
JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca 1 hour ago
Your comment was inane, which is why I gave the “no, you”.
14th_cylon@lemmy.zip 36 minutes ago
oh jeez. i got whole two replies from you, you must be going ad.