Comment on Hydrofoil ferry sets 160-nautical-mile record in longest sea voyage

• 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  without that information the title doesn’t make sense

  you could have just said “i don’t understand”. here, let me help you: a ship has set a record under certain condition.

  if you have a specific information to add, like that it applies to electric ship, it would be much more useful to add it, instead of asking cryptical questions that does not help anyone, and baselessly accusing the poster of changing the headline. that is, if being useful was your goal.

  you are aware that any online server can update their texts, including headlines, and this headline may very well represent the state of the article at the moment it was captured, right? RIGHT?

  source

  • TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    how was kindergarten today? 😂

    If this was a childish behavior contest, you would be winning by a landslide.

    Why even attack someone pointing out the title is misleading and wrong? What’s wrong with you.

    source

    • 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Why even attack someone

      it is the person i am reacting to, who attacked the original poster, in the first sentence that came out of their mouth, without a grain of evidence.

      source

      • TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        without a grain of evidence.

        Ok, let me explain what the evidence is:

        1. The title of the post
        2. The title of the original article

        Is it really that hard to get that?

        I clicked on the post as I thought it’s bullshit as I, who served in the navy for 15 years, did much more than 160Nmi without refueling many times. But apparently it’s about a record for an electric boat, as clearly states in the original article’s title. So the post’s title changed the original title to clickbait.

        But why is it triggering you so much that someone points that out? So much so you have to insult them as being childish? While at the same time behaving childish yourself. Are you just trolling for attention?

        source

        • -> View More Comments
      • Yoddel_Hickory@piefed.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        Well yeah there evidence, the title doesn’t match the article.

        Why are you so angry?

        Many communities here have a rule to keep the original title, and even out of those it is good form.

        But I must repeat: why are you so angry? Is this just how you are or does this reply really make you this angry?

        source

        • -> View More Comments
  • JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Also, the original article had a perfectly fine title. It’s pretty standard when posting to keep the title of the original article you’re linking to instead of editorializing it, unless you’re specifically going to fix something and note that.

    Here, let me help you: copy, paste.

    source

    • 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Also, the original article had a perfectly fine title

      and that is based on… ?

      editorializing it

      your unfounded accusations again.

      source
  • JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Your comment was inane, which is why I gave the “no, you”.

    source

    • 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      inane

      oh jeez. i got whole two replies from you, you must be going ad.

      source

      • JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        inane [ɪˈneɪn]

        adjective

        1. lacking sense or meaning; silly:

           “don’t badger people with inane questions”

        source

        • -> View More Comments