Comment on Would the United States actually risk a Tiananmen Square incident?
Fedizen@lemmy.world 4 days agoIs your plan to rely on the US government to arm the proletariat?
This is what you’re saying will happen as a bunch of internet users with discretionary spending individually buy themselves a third tier weapon from Uncle Sam’s Gun Shop.
1776 only happened because france fucked with the UK’s big cash cow in the carribean at the same time. And it still resulted in chattel slavery. If thats your model for proletarian revolution it sucks.
It was the slave revolts afterward that ended slavery and caused the south to rise up becausw they saw the writing on the wall. Do you think the slaves went out and bought their own guns?
Now, the US has the highest incarceration rate per capita and ICE is funded currently to double the amount of prisoners in the country.
Objection@lemmy.ml 4 days ago
What a bunch of delusional nonsense. If enslaved people had the opportunity to buy guns, then obviously they would have, and obviously they would’ve been right to do so. Perhaps I should avoid reading and writing, since slaves were often not permitted to learn those things.
1776 was a bourgeois revolution, it is not “my model for proletarian revolution” and I don’t have the slightest idea where you pulled that from.
Fedizen@lemmy.world 4 days ago
1776 was the revolution where a bunch of people “bought guns” its the “individual buys a gun” revolution. You know the exact thing you’ve been saying and then getting upset whenever anyone elaborates on it in any way.
Objection@lemmy.ml 4 days ago
Nobody in any other revolution bought any guns.
Fedizen@lemmy.world 4 days ago
That’s obviously not what I’m saying. Most revolutions people did not buy the gun they used. The only examples we have of ones where everyone “bought their own guns” sucks. That’s what I’m saying.